🔗 Share this article

A Denmark-based citizen has been convicted of uploading nude segments from protected movies and television shows on the online platform Reddit.

Based on a police report reviewed by media outlets, the anonymous man posted 347 clips of explicit content in a subreddit he managed, which were then viewed 4.2 million-plus times.

Danish police confirm he has been handed a 7-month suspended sentence for copyright infringement.

Experts say the defendant was charged under a rarely-used clause in Danish intellectual property legislation, with the court finding that by removing the scenes out of their original context, the accused had harmed the performers' "ethical entitlements".

He has also been found guilty of distributing more than 25 terabytes of protected digital content.

From March 2022 to mid-2023, the man known as "the pseudonym KlammereFyr" on Reddit uploaded sexually explicit clips featuring over 100 female performers.

He shared them in the forum he was a moderator of.

Per the Denmark's copyright protection organization the Rights Alliance, his subreddit had more than 6,000 subscribers and participants were encouraged to ask for excerpts of particular performers.

In last year, advocates filed the case to the authorities on behalf of the impacted actors, directors and production companies, which led to the subreddit being shut down.

Andrea Vagn Jensen, one of the performers whose explicit content were shared in the community, explained to local broadcasters at the time she believed there was a distinction between being seen unclothed in a film and being shown on Reddit.

The actress said the uploads constituted "abuse".

'A significant signal'

The man was arrested in fall 2024 and pleaded guilty to the allegations recently.

In a comment following the ruling, the head of the Rights Alliance the organization's leader remarked the decision sent an "significant" signal "indicating violations of creators' entitlements have consequences".

The verdict is considered unique in Denmark for its application of the "moral rights" section of the national copyright law, which specifies an creator's work cannot be used in a manner which infringes upon their reputation.

Intellectual property expert Dr Alina Trapova told the media the case was "rare" for its focus on the damage to the dignity of an artist, rather than to them economically.

How the case could influence other countries is uncertain.

But she said there may be "more and more of such cases" in the coming years with the advancement of artificial intelligence, where "the sanctity of an individual's creative output might be compromised much more easily".