🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. Preferred providers. Out-of-network. Concierge medical services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Co-payment. Co-insurance. Insurance consultants. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. Affordable Care Act. Health Maintenance Organization. Preferred Provider Organization. Exclusive Provider Organization. POS. HDHP. Health Savings Account. Flexible Spending Account. HRA. EOB. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. Small Business Health Options Program. Single coverage. Family coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Baffled? It's understandable. Who understands this complex system? Certainly not the average entrepreneur. Nor the typical worker. Selecting the right medical coverage for our business – or for households – appears to require demands a PhD in medical insurance.

Our Healthcare System Isn't Just Complicated, It Is Expensive

Based on recent research, the average family pays $twenty-seven thousand annually for their health insurance (up 6% compared to last year). The average company healthcare expense is projected to exceed $17,000 for each worker by 2026, an increase of 9.5% from 2025.

Now the government is shut down due to political disagreements regarding tax credits that experts say will lead to a doubling of premiums for millions of Americans.

When Might We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?

When will we seriously consider universal healthcare coverage in the United States? I'm convinced we're getting closer since this can't continue.

I'm not proposing national healthcare. I'm advocating that our already existing Medicare system – an insurance system – merely extend to cover everyone. Our infrastructure doesn't change. How medical professionals receive payment changes. Trust me, they will adjust.

The Way National Health Insurance Could Function

A national health insurance program would need payments from both workers and companies. In comparable systems, a worker making average wages must contribute about 5.3% toward medical coverage. Their employer pays approximately 13.75%.

Does this appear like a lot? Not if you contrast it to what average American pays. I can name dozens of clients who are routinely paying anywhere from 8% to 15% of their employee wages for medical benefits. Remember that with inclusive programs, those payments include pension plans, sick pay, maternity leave and job loss protection in addition to supporting medical services. When including these expenses versus what we pay on retirement programs, job loss coverage and vacation benefits, the difference decreases.

Execution in the US

For America, a national health premium would increase our Medicare tax deduction, a framework already established. It ought to be income-adjusted – those at higher income levels would contribute higher amounts than lower-income earners. There would be both worker and company payments. And, like many our government's military, IT, social programs and infrastructure, the program should be outsourced by private contractors instead of a government office.

Advantages for Small Businesses

Universal healthcare coverage would be a significant advantage for entrepreneurs such as my company. It would place small companies in equal competition against big corporations who can afford better plans. It would render administration much easier (automatic payroll withholding remitted like social security and healthcare taxes, instead of separate payments to insurance companies and coverage administrators).

It would make it easier for us to budget our yearly costs, instead of going through the complicated (and ineffective) theater of negotiating with major insurers that we must do each year. Due to simplification, there would be improved comprehension of coverage among workers – as opposed to existing arrangements which require them to interpret the complexities of current options. Additionally there would certainly be reduced responsibility for companies since we wouldn't have access to our employees' medical records for weighing risks and different options.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as capitalist as they get. But I've learned that government play important functions in society, from providing defense to supporting essential systems. Ensuring medical coverage for everyone through a national insurance system enhances our economy's infrastructure. It represents superior, easier system for entrepreneurs that employ more than half of the country's workers and generate half the economic output. It enables for workers to be healthier, have better attendance and increase productivity.

Addressing Concerns

Exist a million considerations I'm not addressing? Of course there are. But with all the healthcare cost increases experienced recently, it's evident that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning effectively. And I realize that we're not a small, Scandinavian country where big changes are easier to implement. However extending universal Medicare, despite the additional taxes required, would still be a better and more affordable approach both for controlling healthcare costs but providing access to everyone.

Time for Realistic Evaluation

We as Americans, we need to reduce national pride. Our healthcare system isn't exceptional. The US places significantly behind numerous nations in healthcare quality in the world, based on major studies. Perhaps a positive aspect in this present circumstances could be that we take serious examination in the mirror and agree that major reforms are necessary.